http://www.penacclaims.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Siddhant-Manik.pdf Nettet13. mai 2024 · joseph shine v. union of india A write petition was filed by Joseph Shine a non-resident of Kerala under Article 32, challenging the constitutionality of sec. 497 of …
Joseph Shine vs. Union of India- Case Study - Our Legal …
Nettet13. mai 2024 · JOSEPH SHINE V. UNION OF INDIA. A write petition was filed by Joseph Shine a non-resident of Kerala under Article 32, challenging the constitutionality of sec. 497 of IPC read with sec. 198 of Cr.P.C, being violative of Article 14, Article 15 and Article 21. It was claimed by the petitioner that the provision for adultery was discriminatory … Nettet11. nov. 2024 · In the present case, Joseph Shine v Union of India, the Supreme Court led down certain guidelines regarding the provisions of Adultery. The court held that Section 497 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 is violative of Article 14,19 & 21 of the Constitution of India However, the author concludes that, it’s very important to understand the spirit … brake pulse usa
Joseph Shine vs Union of India 2024 Detailed UPSC Analysis
NettetJOSEPH SHINE VS UOI. CASE NO.WP(Cr.) 194/2024 DATE OF FILING10/10/2024 STATUS Disposed PETITIONERS- Joseph Shine Partners for Law in Development RESPONDENTS- Union of India Relevant laws Section 497 IPC - Adultary Section 198(2) Crpc - Who can prosecute Article 14- Equality before law Article 15(3) – Special … NettetNavtej Singh Johar v. Union of India1 is a landmark judgment by the Apex Court and the initial, founding steps towards ameliorating the legal position of homosexual adults. The Supreme Court of India, in September 2024, read down Section 3772 of the Indian Penal Code while reversing the earlier Nettet17. jun. 2024 · Case Name: Joseph Shine v. Union of India Court: Supreme Court of India Citation: 2024 SC 1676 Case Number: Writ Petition (Criminal) no. 194 of 2024 … svala helgadóttir